NEW HAMPSHIRE’S FASTEST GROWING ONLINE NEWSPAPER

Rochester protesters condemn GMOs, Monsanto

Comment Print
Related Articles
Protesters, including Kay-Lee Waters, left, in downtown Rochester on Saturday. (Harrison Thorp photos)

ROCHESTER - Protesters decrying the presence of genetically modified organisms in the public food supply took to the streets of Rochester on Saturday in what has become an annual March Against Monsanto, the chemical corporation that produces the vast majority of GMO seeds in the country.

“It’s awful what they’re doing,” said Kay-Lee Waters of Rochester, who said she just became aware of the GMOs a month ago but is incredibly passionate about the dangers.

A genetically modified organism (GMO) is an organism whose genetic material has been altered using genetic engineering techniques.

Most of the corn, soybeans and cotton grown in the United States are grown with GMO seeds, which are spliced with DNA bacteria that protects them from insects and pests, even the herbicide that is often sprayed on it.

The problem, Waters said, is that once the DNA from one organism is spliced into another, there’s no telling what will happen.

She said there hasn’t been enough testing on what could prove devastating to the world’s food supply, including farm animals who feed on genetically modified food.

About a dozen protesters carried placards downtown and passed out literature on their movement, which is trying to pressure the government into requiring food labeling that would indicate whether or not the product contains GMOs.

Waters said an example of a GMO is when scientists found a bacteria that caused the stomach of an agricultural pest to explode, they spliced its DNA into the corn plant, itself, so that now when the bug eats part of the plant, it dies.

But now, she said, the DNA is in our bodies, too.

She said much of the corn, soybean and canola in this country is grown using Monsanto seeds.

“Most of your processed foods are already contaminated,” she said.

A protester waves a placard condemning corporate giant Monsanto for its development and selling of GMO seeds.

GMOs first came onto the scene in the mid-90s, but much of the controversy surrounding it has missed the mainstream media due to political influence, bribery and corruption, according to Seeds of Death, a two-hour documentary produced by the anti-GMO movement.

Waters said GMOs are banned in many industrialized countries, but still allowed in Canada and the United States.

She attributed Monsanto’s ability to continue to develop new GMOs to a revolving door between the FDA and Monsanto executives and the corporation’s deep pockets.

Some of the effects of GMO usage include diabetes, allergies, leaky gut and reproductive issues, according to scientists and others who are calling on the FDA to halt the practice until more long-term studies are done.

Meanwhile, Waters said at the very least the public has a right to know whether the food it is consuming has been genetically modified.

“If people saw it was genetically modified, they wouldn’t want to eat it,” she said. “But there’s no labeling, so they don’t know.”

So far the FDA has done little. The Obama administration has agreed to let Monsanto continue its research and organism engineering while more research is planned. “Ultimately it is the food producer who is responsible for assuring safety,” an FDA policy states.

Monsanto spokesman have passed the buck to the FDA, saying, “Monsanto should not have to vouchsafe the safety of biotech food … our interest is in selling as much of it as possible. Assuring its safety is the FDA’s job.”

“If the FDA won’t do it and Monsanto has no interest in doing it, then who is going to do it?” Waters asked.

Maine put a GMO labeling law on the books earlier this year, but it won't take effect until four other New England states pass similar laws. Connecticut is the only other New England state to have adopted a GMO labeling law. Connecticut and Maine want the others states on board to discourage Monsanto from suing them over the measure.

To view the documentary Seeds of Death click here.

Read more from:
Top Stories
Tags:
fda, monsanto
Share:
Comment Print
Members Opinions:
May 27, 2014 at 10:29am
Great coverage of the global event, March Against Monsanto! Thank you!

I haven't seen final numbers, but I believe that about 4 million people, in over 50 countries were expected to participate in this peaceful protest/educational day. There was another similar event in Concord NH, with a Rally before a march down main street. There were a number of speakers, literature, non-gmo/organic food samples, music and more!

I would like to make a correction and share additional information:

Connecticut and then Maine, passed laws requiring the labeling of genetically engineered foods in 2013. Both states have "trigger clauses" -- conditions that must be met before the laws pass.

CT requires at least 4 other states in the NorthEast (New England, NY, NJ and PA) to have a similar law. One of the other states must be a bordering state (MA, RI or NY). They also require that 20 million people in the Northeast have a similar law.

ME requires at least 4 other CONTIGUOUS states … which means NH MUST pass a similar law for Maine to enact their law.

Vermont just passed a labeling law this month … with NO trigger clause. They are giving grocers time to label their food; the law goes into effect in July 2016.

The Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) has announced that they will be suing the State of Vermont. A fund has been set up to help with the lawsuit, which, as far as we know, has not yet been filed.

NH came very close to passing a House bill in early 2014. A strong bill requiring the mandatory labeling of genetically engineered foods or foods with GE ingredients, has been referred for interim study in the NH Senate. We will be working very hard during the election process and into the new year to ensure that NH joins our neighboring states.

More than half of the US states are working on laws to label GE foods. 64 other countries -- affecting 2/3 of the world's population -- have laws about GE foods. US and Canada are the only two major industrialized countries without this privilege. We have two pending federal bills, one in the House and one in the Senate, which require mandatory labeling, but they are not likely to come out of committee. There is also a bill in the US House to block states from labeling and rule that foods that have been created by scientists in a lab, with no long-term health studies, are "natural." It calls for a voluntary labeling law, which we have had since 2001. No companies want to show that their ingredients are genetically engineered.

The GMA spent nearly $70 million dollars trying to block labeling in just two states, California and Washington, some through illegal money laundering. Why do food manufacturers want to prevent us from having the right to know what we are eating and feeding our children???


For more information, we invite readers to visit our website and follow us on Facebook:
http://NHRightToKnowGMO.org
www.facebook.com/NHRightToKnowGMO
info at NHRightToKnowGMO dot org

Respectfully,
Bonnie Wright, NH Right to Know GMO

Powered by Bondware
News Publishing Software

The browser you are using is outdated!

You may not be getting all you can out of your browsing experience
and may be open to security risks!

Consider upgrading to the latest version of your browser or choose on below: