I never went to a Charlie Kirk event. I never watched him debate and have discourse on college campuses. And I never watched any of the hundreds of his videos that permeate the internet.
But I have now. I've watched dozens of Charlie Kirk videos where he talked openly with college students, who have been indoctrinated, not educated, by leftist professors who own a virtual monopoly on what is taught at colleges and universities nationwide.
And after watching Charlie Kirk in joyful debate over hours on Youtube since his death, I have never seen or heard one iota of racist or bigoted or prejudicial language coming out of his mouth.
So why would New York rep Alexandria Ocasio Cortez imply he was racist, saying "his rhetoric and beliefs were ignorant and uneducated and sought to disenfranchise millions of Americans."
I never saw him be disrespectful or contemptuous or insulting with any man or woman, be they black, white, Native American, Asian or Jew.
No one.
He was like the happy warrior; he reveled in reason and debate and discourse and to put it mildly, he held his own.
The fact that AOC would even use the word "uneducated" is unfathomable. "Uneducated" means you have no education.
Yeah, Charlie never graduated college; neither did NBC news anchor Lester Holt. I guess he's "uneducated," too, right AOC?
And ignorant is just an opinion.
Like if someone doesn't agree with you, and you have nothing cogent to say, you just say "you're just ignorant!"
And who'd he disenfranchise. I don't even get that. Disenfranchise?
Maybe it's AOC who's ignorant. Of course, that's just my opinion.